Smoketest vs Checkly: monitoring as code, or from a sentence.
Checkly is monitoring-as-code: engineers write checks in Playwright and TypeScript and deploy them from git. Smoketest monitors the same kind of real-browser test from a sentence, so anyone on the team can add one.
No Playwright, no TypeScript, no git. Your first run in about two minutes.
Both do monitoring. They differ on who can author a check.
Checkly and Smoketest both run real-browser tests against production on a schedule and on every deploy. The difference is how a check gets written and who can write one.
How a check is authored
Checkly checks are Playwright and TypeScript, committed to git. Smoketest tests are a sentence or two.
Even with AI
Checkly's AI can generate a check, but it produces code an engineer reviews and commits. Smoketest needs no code at any step.
Who can add one
Checkly is built for engineers and coding agents. With Smoketest, a PM, founder, or support lead can add a test.
What a failure shows
Checkly returns logs, traces, and video. Smoketest hands you a recording, a transcript, and a pass or fail result with reasoning.
No selectors. No test file.
Start on the login page. Log in with the test account. Open the orders page. Confirm the latest order is visible.
Smoketest vs Checkly, at a glance.
Checkly or Smoketest?
Checkly is the better fit when you
Cover the tests that matter.
Login
Checkout
Onboarding
Billing
Magic link
PR previews
The whole story, not just a red X.
Every failed run hands you a recording, a transcript, the result, and the downloadable Playwright trace.
Jira or Linear starts the Test.
Keep the workflow where QA already works. Smoketest adds execution, evidence, and routing without becoming another board.
Connect Jira or Linear
A workspace owner authorizes Jira or Linear once. Smoketest keeps Connection identity, permissions, token health, and webhook health visible.
Define the QA handoff
Choose the team or board, exact QA status, direct Passed and Development statuses, then set the URL, Environment, device, and access settings.
Let the ticket start testing
When a ticket enters QA, Smoketest freezes current context, enriches it from an eligible ticket-linked pull request, generates one Test, and runs it automatically.
Return the Result safely
Smoketest posts evidence to one evolving Attempt comment. Passed moves forward, Failed returns to Development, and No Result stays in QA. Newer human changes always win.
Teams comparing us to Checkly ask these.
Yes, and it's good. Checkly's AI can generate a check and help investigate failures. But the check it produces is Playwright and TypeScript that an engineer reviews and commits. Smoketest needs no code at any step: you describe the test and the agent runs it.
No. A Smoketest test is a sentence or two, so a PM, founder, or support lead can add one. Checkly checks are written in Playwright and TypeScript and deployed from git.
For real-browser user tests, yes. Run them against production on a schedule or on every deploy, and get alerted when one breaks. Checkly also covers API and multistep checks and infrastructure-as-code, which Smoketest does not.
Yes. Every run saves a downloadable Playwright trace alongside the recording, transcript, and result.
About two minutes: paste a URL, write the test, run it once, then schedule it. No repo, pipeline, or deploy step to wire up.
Add a check without writing one.
Describe a test in a sentence, run it against your live app, and get a recording and a result. No Playwright, no TypeScript, no git.
Read the docs